Consensus Tussle: A Threat To Internal Democracy In The APC -By Abdulsamad Danji Abdulqadir & Salim Aliyu

In every democratic system, political parties serve as the backbone of representation, participation, and leadership selection. Their strength lies not only in electoral victories but also in the fairness, transparency, and inclusiveness of their internal processes. Within the All Progressives Congress (APC), however, the increasing reliance on consensus as a mode of primary election has sparked serious concerns about the future unity, credibility, and democratic integrity of the party.

Consensus, in principle, is not inherently flawed. It is often presented as a peaceful and cost-effective alternative to competitive primaries, aimed at reducing internal conflict and fostering unity. When genuinely agreed upon by all aspirants, it can serve as a tool for harmony. However, the problem arises when consensus is imposed rather than negotiated when it becomes a strategy used by powerful actors to sideline other aspirants and impose preferred candidates.

In recent times, many aspirants within the APC have invested heavily financially, emotionally, and politically by purchasing nomination forms and mobilizing support across their constituencies. These individuals enter the race with the expectation of a level playing field, only to find themselves abruptly edged out by last-minute consensus arrangements that favor a single candidate. This practice not only discourages political participation but also undermines the very essence of democracy within the party.

The situation witnessed in states like Katsina, Gombe, and several senatorial districts and constituencies reflects a troubling pattern. Aspirants who have worked tirelessly to build their political base are often left frustrated and disillusioned when the process is hijacked in favor of pre-selected candidates. Such actions breed resentment, weaken party cohesion, and create factions that may later manifest as internal crises or electoral setbacks.

A political party that fails to uphold justice and fairness in its internal affairs risks losing the trust of its members. When aspirants feel cheated or marginalized, the consequences extend beyond individual grievances they affect the party’s overall stability. Persistent imposition of candidates under the guise of consensus may lead to apathy, defections, and prolonged disputes, ultimately weakening the party’s chances in general elections.

Democracy thrives on competition. It is through open contestation of ideas and leadership that the best candidates emerge. By suppressing this process, the party deprives itself of the opportunity to identify credible, competent, and widely accepted leaders. Instead, it risks promoting candidates who may lack grassroots support, thereby jeopardizing electoral success.

For the APC to remain strong, relevant, and united, there must be a deliberate effort to restore confidence in its internal democratic processes. Consensus should only be adopted when it is truly voluntary and inclusive, not when it is manipulated to serve narrow interests. Transparent primaries, respect for aspirants, and adherence to established guidelines are essential to building a party that commands loyalty and trust.

As concerned stakeholders, we must collectively advocate for reforms that prioritize fairness and accountability. The future of the party depends not on short-term political convenience but on long-term institutional strength. If the current trend continues unchecked, the APC risks entrenching a culture of injustice that could ultimately erode its foundation.

The tussle over consensus is not merely an internal party issue it is a test of democratic values. To safeguard the integrity and unity of the APC, leaders and members alike must reject any process that undermines justice, equity, and participation. Only then can the party truly stand as a symbol of democratic progress and national development.