Connect with us

Africa

Okpebholo’s Threat Against Peter Obi: A Direct Assault on Democracy -By Jeff Okoroafor

Nigeria’s democracy cannot survive if governors believe they can dictate which citizens are “allowed” in their states. This is not governance—it is tyranny in embryonic form, and it must be resisted by all democratic forces in Nigeria. A governor who threatens citizens for their political affiliation is unfit for public office in a democracy. This principle must be upheld today to protect Nigeria’s democratic future.

Published

on

Monday Okpebholo and Peter Obi

In a shocking display of executive arrogance, Edo State Governor Monday Okpebholo issued a direct threat against former presidential candidate Peter Obi during a public event on July 18, 2025. The sitting governor, who should be the chief security officer and unifying figure for all Edo and by extension Nigeria residents regardless of political affiliation, instead chose to intimidate a prominent opposition leader, declaring that Peter Obi was “not welcome” in Edo State. This reprehensible conduct represents more than just political brinkmanship—it constitutes a gross abuse of power that undermines Nigeria’s constitutional democracy. When a sitting governor uses his office to threaten political opponents, he crosses the line from partisan politics into authoritarianism.

The Incident: A Governor’s Shocking Threat

During what should have been a routine visit by Peter Obi to engage with nursing students in Edo State as well as other stakeholders on national issues, Governor Okpebholo made inflammatory remarks captured on video, stating, “Let me warn Peter Obi to stay away from Edo State. He should not come here to disturb our peace. If he knows what’s good for him, he will listen to this warning.” These words from a sitting governor carry ominous implications. Unlike a mere candidate making campaign rhetoric, Governor Okpebholo wields the full power of the state—including control of security apparatuses—making his threat particularly dangerous.

Why This Matters Profoundly

The Nigerian Constitution guarantees all citizens, including Peter Obi, the right to freedom of movement and association. A governor has no legal authority to bar any Nigerian from any state. As chief executive, Okpebholo’s threat suggests a willingness to misuse state resources against political opponents—a hallmark of authoritarian regimes. When sitting governors can threaten opposition figures with impunity, it creates a climate of fear that stifles democratic competition. Such statements from a governor could embolden overzealous supporters or security agents to take unlawful actions against opposition figures.

The Bigger Picture: Nigeria’s Democratic Backsliding

This incident fits a disturbing national pattern of weaponizing state power against opposition figures, eroding federalism as state governors act like feudal lords over their domains, and normalizing political violence from rhetoric to actual attacks on opponents. Governor Okpebholo’s conduct is particularly egregious because he is not a mere candidate but the sitting governor, his threat carries the implicit weight of state power, and it establishes a dangerous precedent for other governors.

Required Actions

INEC must issue a strong statement condemning this abuse of power, while the Nigeria Governors’ Forum should sanction Okpebholo. Civil society organizations must mobilize against this threat to democracy. The Nigerian Bar Association should file a complaint with the Police Service Commission, and the National Human Rights Commission must investigate. Opposition parties should table a motion in the National Assembly, and the international community should take note ahead of future elections. Edo residents must demand their governor respects constitutional rights, and the media must maintain a spotlight on this abuse of power.

Conclusion: Defending Democracy from Executive Excesses

Governor Okpebholo’s threat represents everything wrong with Nigeria’s political culture—the transformation of public office into personal fiefdoms where constitutional rights are suspended for political opponents. If left unchallenged, such behavior will further erode Nigeria’s democratic foundations, encourage other governors to act similarly, and normalize political intimidation at the highest levels. The time for decisive action is now. Nigeria’s democracy cannot survive if governors believe they can dictate which citizens are “allowed” in their states. This is not governance—it is tyranny in embryonic form, and it must be resisted by all democratic forces in Nigeria. A governor who threatens citizens for their political affiliation is unfit for public office in a democracy. This principle must be upheld today to protect Nigeria’s democratic future.

Jeff Okoroafor - Africans Angle and Opinion Nigeria

Jeff Okoroafor

Jeff Okoroafor is a social accountability advocate and a political commentator focused on governance, accountability, and social justice in West Africa.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *