Reuben Abati’s Interview Misstep: A Reminder of Journalistic Standards and Respect, by John Egbeazien Oshodi

In the realm of broadcast journalism, the recent panel discussion on Arise News TV featuring Reuben Abati, Rufai Oseni, and a female anchor has ignited a firestorm of criticism and reflection. The discourse, intended to explore the intricate political and legal dynamics between former Governor Wike, now the FCT Minister, and his successor, Rivers State Governor, Siminalayi Fubara, veered into a territory that many viewers deemed unprofessional and disrespectful. At the center of this controversy was the Caretaker Chairman of Ikwerre Local Government Area in Rivers State, Darlington Orji, who was subjected to a line of questioning that was not only perceived as condescending but also as an affront to the principles of ethical journalism.

The discussion, which aimed to delve into the political and legal tensions, descended into a less-than-professional exchange. The moment that sparked public outcry was when Reuben Abati, in an apparent attempt to question Orji’s qualifications, stated, “I don’t know what you do, I don’t know you are a chairman, but I don’t know your background, whether it’s carpentry or something else.” This remark was met with criticism, with some viewers commenting, “Are there no checks and balances on Arise TV? Why bring on a guest just to insult them?”

The derogatory nature of Abati’s comment was not lost on the audience, with many taking to social media to express their disapproval. One viewer remarked, “Dr. Abati and Ruffai, you both specifically have not guided yourselves professionally in this interview…you were both ridiculous, insulting.” The sentiment was echoed by others who felt that Abati’s line of questioning was not only unproductive but also demeaning.

Orji, in his response, clarified his educational background, stating, “I have a PhD in Human Resources Management,” which further highlighted the inappropriateness of Abati’s insinuation. The exchange prompted a reflection on the standards of journalism and the responsibility of media personalities to conduct interviews with respect and professionalism.

The public outcry following the interview serves as a reminder of the power of words and the impact they can have on both the individual being interviewed and the broader audience. Comments such as, “Abati is very insulting and arrogant,” and “Why don’t Reuben allow the CTC Chairman to explain what he said instead of ‘suggesting’ what he said and using derogatory words,” underscore the need for journalists to maintain a level of decorum, even when discussing contentious issues.

As someone with a background in public media advisory, journalism, and as a newspaper columnist, it is crucial to maintain a level of decorum and respect in your interactions, especially when representing a public face for Nigerians. The fact that the interviewee felt the need to clarify his educational background, which includes a PhD in Human Resources Management, underscores the inappropriate nature of your comments.

This incident serves as a reminder of the importance of professionalism and respectful dialogue in journalism. It highlights the need for journalists to be mindful of their language and the impact it has on the audience and the subjects of their interviews. Words matter, and they should be chosen carefully, especially when representing the media at large.

Moreover, the incident has sparked a conversation about the role of media in public discourse and the importance of fostering an environment where all participants are treated with respect. As one viewer noted, “Mr. Reuben Abati made a caricature of the gentleman which is completely an aberration of professional conduct which he preaches against. Dr. Orji spoke well, despite being insulted he remained focused. Kudos to him. That’s a plus one on his personality.”

In the wake of the controversial interview on Arise News TV, a profound reflection on the conduct of Reuben Abati has emerged, shedding light on the pivotal role of professionalism, respect, and ethical journalism. The exchange, which descended into overt disrespect, has ignited a critical examination of the standards expected from media personalities, particularly in handling sensitive discussions. This incident is not merely a lapse in decorum but a significant breach that calls into question the ethical foundations of journalism.

The widespread dissemination of the interview has underscored the media’s obligation to introspect and prevent such breaches of professionalism. It serves as a clarion call for journalists to reevaluate their approaches, ensuring that fairness, accuracy, and respect are at the forefront of their reporting. The psychological impact of witnessing a trusted media figure display such blatant disregard for professional ethics cannot be overstated. It erodes public trust and sets a dangerous precedent for journalistic conduct.

Within the Nigerian media landscape, a developing African society where journalists play a vital role in accountability and opinion formation, the incident has resonated deeply. It serves as a poignant reminder of the responsibility to maintain the highest professional standards and to create an environment where all voices are treated with dignity. The media’s role in shaping societal values and norms means that every instance of disrespect and unprofessionalism reverberates far beyond the immediate context, potentially normalizing such behavior.

The aftermath of the interview offers a moment of reckoning for Reuben Abati and the Nigerian media, challenging them to recommit to ethical journalism. This is a pivotal opportunity to contemplate the influence of their words on individuals and society and to embrace a more thoughtful and respectful discourse. Ethical lapses not only damage the credibility of the individual journalist but also undermine the integrity of the entire media industry.

The reference to “carpentry” in Abati’s comment has sparked particular concern, as it appears to denigrate certain professions. This attitude is not only disrespectful but also threatens to exacerbate social disparities and diminish the value of skilled labor. The psychological impact of such statements is profound, reinforcing harmful stereotypes and devaluing essential vocations. Media personalities must recognize the worth of every profession and conduct interviews with the understanding that all guests deserve to be heard and respected.

Furthermore, the incident underscores the need for media professionals to be acutely aware of their language and its impact. The media’s powerful influence on public perception necessitates that journalists use their platforms to foster respect, understanding, and inclusivity. The psychological burden of irresponsible journalism falls on the audience, who look to the media for truth and integrity.

In a diverse society like Nigeria’s, the media has a crucial role in uniting people and celebrating the diverse contributions of its members. By doing so, the media can cultivate a more cohesive and respectful public discourse that mirrors the values of a democratic and inclusive society. The media’s responsibility extends beyond reporting; it encompasses the moral duty to uphold the principles of equality and respect.

Ultimately, the interview on Arise News TV has highlighted the indispensable need for professionalism, respect, and ethical conduct in journalism. This incident serves as a call to action for Reuben Abati to exemplify the core values of journalism, ensuring that the Nigerian media navigates the complexities of the political terrain with unwavering integrity, thereby safeguarding and enhancing the public’s trust. The psychological and societal ramifications of this incident are far-reaching, making it imperative for the media to introspect and adhere strictly to ethical standards. One might consider periodic lessons or courses on respect for interviewees and interviewers, as well as journalistic ethics, whether face-to-face or online, to reinforce these principles.

The incident has highlighted the importance of accountability and the necessity for media personalities to consider the impact of their words. It is a moment that demands reflection and, if warranted, a sincere apology from Abati to address the concerns raised by the public. Such an apology would not only be an acknowledgment of a lapse in judgment but also a commitment to upholding the standards of responsible journalism.

As we await the next steps from Abati, it is our hope that this incident will prompt a broader conversation about media ethics and the role of journalists in society. It is through such dialogue and a commitment to continuous improvement that the Nigerian media can continue to serve as a beacon of truth and a platform for constructive discourse.

Professor John Egbeazien Oshodi, born in Uromi, Edo State, Nigeria, is an American-based police and prison scientist, forensic psychologist, public policy psychologist, and legal psychologist. He’s a government advisor on forensic-clinical psychological services in the USA and the founder of the Dr. John Egbeazien Oshodi Foundation for Psychological Health. With a significant role in introducing forensic psychology to Nigeria through N.U.C. and Nasarawa State University, he’s also a former Secretary-General of the Nigeria Psychological Association. He’s taught at esteemed institutions like Florida Memorial University, Florida International University, Nova Southeastern University, and more, and is currently an online faculty member at Weldios University, Nexus International University, and Walden University. John.Oshodi@mail.waldenu.edu