Human Rights And Business: The Role Of Nigerian Courts In Protecting Rights In The Corporate Sector -By Ishie-Johnson Emmanuel Esq.

ABSTRACT

The intersection of business operations and human rights protection in Nigeria raises critical concerns about corporate accountability. Nigerian courts play a pivotal role in safeguarding these rights, yet their effectiveness in enforcing corporate responsibility remains limited. This article examines the judiciary’s contributions to human rights protection within the corporate sector, analyzing landmark cases, persistent challenges, and pathways for reform. It evaluates the extant legal framework, key judicial decisions, and their implications for corporate accountability. Findings reveal notable judicial progress, tempered by barriers such as restricted access to justice and deficient regulatory mechanisms. Recommendations include bolstering regulatory frameworks, improving access to justice, and fostering corporate adherence to human rights standards.

INTRODUCTION

In Nigeria, the nexus between business operations and human rights protection has grown increasingly complex, raising concerns over corporate accountability and access to justice for affected communities. While Nigerian courts play a vital role in safeguarding these rights, their efficacy in enforcing corporate responsibility remains limited. This article examines the judiciary’s role in the corporate sector, analyzing the legal framework, landmark cases, key challenges, and reform recommendations.

As Nigeria’s economy expands; driven by investments in oil and gas, mining, and agriculture; judicial intervention becomes essential to balance commercial interests with human rights imperatives. Courts must address pressing issues such as environmental degradation, labor abuses, and community displacement. Ultimately, bolstering judicial mechanisms will enhance corporate accountability, access to justice, and sustainable development.

LEGAL FRAMEWORK

Nigeria’s legal framework for human rights protection in business operations integrates domestic legislation, international treaties, and regulatory instruments. The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as amended) serves as the grundnorm, enshrining fundamental rights under Chapter IV, including the right to life (s 33), dignity of the human person (s 34), and fair hearing (s 36)—provisions invoked in corporate-related disputes within sectors like oil and gas, mining, and agriculture.

The African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (Ratification and Enforcement) Act (Cap A9 LFN 2004) domesticates the African Charter, affording it domestic legal force. Relevant provisions encompass the right to health (art 16), healthy environment (art 24), and fair trial (art 7), directly applicable to business impacts.

Key regulatory statutes governing corporate activities include the Companies and Allied Matters Act 2020, which addresses company incorporation, management, directors’ duties, and shareholder rights; the Nigerian Investment Promotion Commission Act (Cap N117 LFN 2004), which promotes investments, protection, and dispute resolution; and the Environmental; impact Assessment Act 1992, mandating assessments for projects to mitigate environmental harm.

International frameworks further shape Nigeria’s human rights obligations in business contexts. The UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (2011), endorsed by Nigeria, establish the Protect, Respect, and Remedy framework, delineating state duties to protect, corporate responsibilities to respect rights, and access to effective remedies. Likewise, Nigeria’s commitment to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs); particularly Goal 8 (decent work and economic growth) and Goal 16 (peace, justice, and strong institutions); reinforces these imperatives.

Domestic regulatory agencies, including the National Human Rights Commission and the Corporate Affairs Commission, are pivotal in enforcement. Yet, persistent challenges undermine efficacy: inadequate implementation, corruption, and barriers to justice for affected communities.

LANDMARK CASES

Nigerian courts, alongside regional tribunals, have significantly advanced human rights jurisprudence in business contexts, particularly addressing corporate harms in the Niger Delta.In Social and Economic Rights Action Centre (SERAC) v Nigeria (African Commission, Communication 155/96, 2001), the Commission held Nigeria liable for failing to prevent oil operations jointly conducted with Shell—that caused environmental degradation, health violations, and livelihood destruction among the Ogoni people.

Similarly, Jonah Gbemre v Shell Petroleum Development Company (Federal High Court, FHC/B/CS/53/05, 2005) declared Shell’s gas flaring unconstitutional, as it breached constitutional rights to life (s 33) and dignity (s 34), incorporating a right to a clean environment under the African Charter.

Regional rulings include SERAC v Shell (ECOWAS Community Court of Justice, 2005), which found Shell liable for complicity in abuses like environmental harm in Ogoniland. In Gbemire v Shell Petroleum Development Company (Federal High Court, 2017), courts awarded damages to Niger Delta communities for oil spill-induced environmental and human rights violations.

These precedents affirm judicial resolve to impose corporate accountability, yet enforcement gaps, judgment compliance issues, and access barriers for communities persist.

CHALLENGES FACED BY THE COURTS

Nigerian courts encounter significant obstacles in upholding human rights against corporate actors, as outlined below:

1. Limited access to justice: Affected communities often lack resources, awareness, and capacity to litigate against powerful corporations.

2. Inadequate regulatory frameworks: Weak laws and regulations hinder effective enforcement of human rights standards.

3. Judicial capacity: Limited expertise and resources constrain courts’ ability to handle complex human rights cases.

4. Enforcement of judgments: Difficulty enforcing judgments against corporations, particularly multinational companies.

5. Corruption and influence: Corruption and corporate influence undermine judicial independence and effectiveness.

6. Lack of corporate accountability: Companies often fail to respect human rights, with inadequate consequences.

These challenges collectively undermine the courts’ efficacy in protecting human rights within the corporate sector.

RECOMMENDATIONS

To bolster Nigerian courts’ role in safeguarding human rights within the corporate sector, the following measures are proposed:

1. Strengthen regulatory frameworks: Enact comprehensive legislation delineating corporate human rights obligations and imposing stringent penalties for violations.

2. Enhance access to justice: Develop legal aid programs, funding mechanisms, and support services tailored for affected communities pursuing litigation.

3. Build judicial capacity: Deliver specialized training and allocate resources to judges adjudicating business and human rights disputes.

4. Promote corporate accountability: Mandate adoption of human rights due diligence policies and transparent reporting by corporations.

5. Improve enforcement mechanisms: Establish robust systems to ensure compliance with judgments, including against multinational entities.

6. Foster stakeholder engagement: Facilitate ongoing dialogue among communities, corporations, and government agencies.

These targeted reforms will empower courts to more effectively uphold human rights amid corporate activities.

CONCLUSION

Nigerian courts play a pivotal role in enforcing corporate accountability and upholding human rights amid business operations. Despite notable progress in jurisprudence, persistent challenges i.e. limited access to justice, inadequate regulatory frameworks, and enforcement deficits undermine efficacy. Also, targeted reforms, including robust legislation, judicial capacity-building, and accountability mechanisms, are imperative. Such measures will foster sustainable development, equitable economic growth, and inclusive justice. Ultimately, collaborative action among government, corporations, and civil society is essential to realize human rights protection in Nigeria’s corporate sector.

REFERENCES

Books

United Nations. UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UN Human Rights Council, 2011).

Journal Articles

Amaeshi K, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility in Nigeria: A Review of the Literature’ (2017) 140 Journal of Business Ethics 237.

Eze MO, ‘Adjudicating Human Rights in Nigeria: Challenges and Prospects’ (2019) 11 Journal of Human Rights Practice 245.

Nwankwo C, ‘Access to Justice in Nigeria: The Role of the Courts in Promoting Human Rights’ (2020) 24 International Journal of Human Rights 1.

Okafor EE, ‘Business and Human Rights in Nigeria: The Impact of Oil and Gas Industry on Local Communities’ (2018) 20 Journal of Business and Management 1.

Ogbonna I, ‘Regulatory Frameworks and Corporate Accountability in Nigeria’ (2020) 5 Journal of Corporate Law and Governance 1.

Ishie-Johnson Emmanuel Esq. Writes from Ishie-Johnson and Associates

Email: emmajohnsonace@gmail.com

Phone No: 08033816237, 08023186281