Palliative Politics: The Carrot And Stick Approach In Nigeria’s Governance, by Isaac Asabor

It is not an exaggeration to opine that in Nigeria that the term “palliative” has taken on a deeper, more cynical meaning, becoming emblematic of the government’s carrot and stick approach to managing the masses. Palliatives, once intended as temporary relief measures during times of crisis, have evolved into a tool of governance, a method of pacifying the population while maintaining control.

Afe Babalola, a respected legal luminary, has been one of the most vocal critics of this approach. In a recent statement, Babalola argued that palliative measures are merely superficial solutions that fail to address the underlying economic challenges facing the nation. “What Nigeria needs is not just temporary relief,” Babalola asserted, “but sustainable solutions that uplift the people out of poverty, not keep them in perpetual dependence on government handouts.”

Babalola’s concerns resonate with many Nigerians who have come to view palliatives as a distraction from the government’s failure to implement meaningful economic reforms. The temporary relief provided by these measures often fades quickly, leaving the deeper issues of poverty, unemployment, and inflation unaddressed.

In the same vein, Dr. Oby Ezekwesili, a former Minister of Education and an advocate for transparency and good governance, shares Babalola’s sentiments. She has long criticized the government’s reliance on palliatives, viewing them as symptomatic of a broader failure in governance. “Palliatives are not a substitute for good governance,” Ezekwesili stated in a recent interview. “They are a symptom of a government that is reactive rather than proactive, one that fails to plan for the long-term welfare of its citizens.”

Ezekwesili emphasizes that the distribution of palliatives, while necessary in times of crisis, should not be the cornerstone of any government’s strategy for managing the economy. Instead, she calls for policies that promote economic growth, job creation, and social equity, policies that provide Nigerians with the tools they need to build better lives for themselves, rather than relying on government handouts.

Also speaking from the same standpoint, Comrade Joe Ajaero, President of the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), said, “Labor will not be silenced by palliatives“. This is a he once warned that palliatives are no substitute for fair wages and decent working conditions. “The government cannot continue to pacify the masses with crumbs while the cost of living skyrockets,” Ajaero said during  a recent protest. “We will not be silenced by palliatives. What Nigerian workers need is not charity, but justice.”

Ajaero’s words reflect a growing frustration among the working class, who see palliatives as a poor substitute for real economic progress. The labor movement has repeatedly called on the government to address the root causes of the economic crisis, including inflation, unemployment, and the devaluation of the naira, rather than relying on temporary relief measures that do little to improve the long-term prospects of the average Nigerian.

Without a doubt, not a few learned an renowned experts in various human endeavors have unanimously condemned palliatives, saying that it should not be a substitute for economic reform. In fact, not a few Nigerians versed in economic and economic disciplines have weighed in on the debate, urging the government to focus on structural economic reforms rather than short-term fixes, unanimously noting that palliatives should be a last resort, not a first response as they are a temporary measure to address immediate needs, but they should not be a substitute for the hard work of economic reform.

They argues that the over-reliance on palliatives reflects a lack of political will to tackle the more difficult challenges facing the nation, such as corruption, inefficiency, and the need for diversification of the economy. They call for a comprehensive approach to economic management that includes investment in education, infrastructure, and healthcare, as well as the promotion of entrepreneurship and innovation.

Without sounding hyperbolical in this context, the voices of Babalola, Ezekwesili, Ajaero, and other versed Nigerians resonate in the fact government’s reliance on palliatives is unsustainable. They variously noted that carrot and stick approach, offering temporary relief to avoid unrest while imposing harsh economic measures, has created a vicious cycle of dependency and dissatisfaction.

For many Nigerians, palliatives are seen as a form of control, a way for the government to keep the masses in check without addressing the systemic issues that keep them in poverty. The carrot, in this case, is the temporary relief of palliatives; the stick is the austerity measures, rising prices, and lack of opportunities that keep the people in a constant state of economic insecurity.

In fact, breaking this cycle requires a fundamental shift in the government’s approach to economic management. Palliatives should not be the cornerstone of any administration’s strategy for managing the economy. Instead, the focus should be on implementing long-term reforms that address the root causes of poverty and inequality, ensuring that all Nigerians have the opportunity to thrive.

As Afe Babalola and others have pointed out, the real solution lies in creating a sustainable economy where the people are empowered, not pacified. Until then, the carrot and stick approach will continue to be a symbol of the government’s failure to provide true leadership and vision for the future of Nigeria.