Nigeria’s Flawed Trade Subject Examinations: The Assessment Crisis Undermining Skill Development -By Aku Uche Henry Jr

Nigeria’s challenges with trade and entrepreneurship subjects extend beyond curriculum and instructor capacity. The assessment model used to evaluate students is fundamentally misaligned with the intended outcomes of the programme.

At present, students offering trade subjects sit for a combination of objectives, theory and limited practical examinations. On the surface, this appears structured. In practice, however, it produces graduates who are theoretically exposed but practically underprepared.

A System That Mis-measures Skill

An illustrative example makes the problem clear.
A skilled GSM repair technician in Lagos’ Computer Village — someone capable of diagnosing and fixing a faulty device in minutes — would almost certainly fail the WAEC examination in GSM maintenance. Not because he lacks competence, but because the exam prioritises theoretical constructs over practical demonstration.

This disconnect reveals a deeper issue: Nigeria is evaluating skills with instruments designed for academic theory, not vocational capacity.

Trade subjects were introduced to:

• Equip young people with market-ready skills
• Reduce unemployment
• Provide alternatives to crime and cyber fraud
• Strengthen economic productivity
• Create a pipeline of artisans, creators and technicians

Yet the examinations used to measure these skills mirror those designed for university-bound students.

A Shift to Performance-Based Assessment

If the goal is to produce practitioners rather than theorists, then assessment must reflect that intent.

A workable, globally aligned model should include:

Term-by-term practical assessments: Students demonstrate actual competence in real-world tasks.

Cumulative grading: Skill development is continuous and cannot be accurately measured through a single high-stakes exam.

Teacher-led evaluation with external moderation: WAEC and NECO can provide oversight through random inspections to maintain standardisation.

Elimination of theory-heavy exams for hands-on trades: Practical subjects require practical assessment; anything else undermines purpose.

International best practice is clear: vocational education must be evaluated through performance, not memorisation.

Aligning Purpose With Measurement

Nigeria does not lack competent young people. It lacks an assessment system that captures and nurtures their abilities.
Until curriculum, purpose and evaluation align, trade subjects will continue to produce graduates who hold certificates but lack industry-ready competence.

If the country wants a generation capable of building, repairing, installing, designing, and innovating, it must begin by measuring what truly matters.

Skill is practical.
Assessment must be too.