Africa
The Fragility of Nigeria’s Security Sovereignty and The Crumbling American Façade -By Abdullahi Abubakar Ladan
AIPAC is the largest pro-Israel lobbying organization in the U.S., which uses its funding (expected to spend $100 million in the 2023-24 cycle, per In These Times) to secure and protect pro-Israel voices in Congress, pushing a pro-Israeli agenda and a Christian Zionist agenda through these supported representatives.
The recent exchange of high-level delegations between Abuja and Washington, D.C., is a profound power negotiation driven by two converging crises: Nigeria’s escalating security challenges and the shifting, highly partisan politics of American foreign policy, particularly concerning Israel. This dual exchange exposes the complex vulnerabilities of Nigeria’s sovereignty, compelling us to critically examine the motives of our supposed allies. The trip led by Nigeria’s National Security Adviser, Mallam Nuhu Ribadu, to the U.S. capital in November 2025 was a high-stakes mission focused on security diplomacy, designed to counter mounting pressure from the U.S. Congress to designate Nigeria as a Country of Particular Concern (CPC). The outcome, while securing immediate cooperation, came with clear conditions: a Joint Working Group (JWG) on security was agreed upon to formalize intelligence sharing, but the U.S. side, particularly the Pentagon, made it clear that sustained cooperation is conditional on Nigeria demonstrating tangible progress in stopping violence against Christians and tackling jihadist groups. This was a direct response to the powerful congressional lobby relying on reports from groups like the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF), which advocates for the CPC designation. The subsequent visit of the five-member U.S. Congressional Delegation (CODEL) to Nigeria, which met with NSA Ribadu today 7th December 2025, served as the enforcement mechanism for these conditions.
The composition of this delegation reveals the true political agenda at play: every Republican member, Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart (R-FL), facing ethics complaints regarding simultaneous “primary residency” claims for tax breaks; Rep. Scott Franklin (R-FL), facing FEC complaints regarding failure to disclose donor information; Rep. Juan Ciscomani (R-AZ), criticized for voting to cut Medicaid and SNAP benefits; and Rep. Riley M. Moore (R-WV), who led the state measure to penalize companies engaging in the BDS movement, are staunch supporters of Israel’s actions in Gaza and are strongly supported by and aligned with the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC). Even the lone Democrat, Rep. Norma Torres (D-CA), who faced protests for opposing a Gaza ceasefire, took an AIPAC-linked trip to Israel in March 2024.
AIPAC is the largest pro-Israel lobbying organization in the U.S., which uses its funding (expected to spend $100 million in the 2023-24 cycle, per In These Times) to secure and protect pro-Israel voices in Congress, pushing a pro-Israeli agenda and a Christian Zionist agenda through these supported representatives. Americans have recently raised concerns about this outsized influence; for instance, the Harvard Youth Poll (December 2025) shows that among registered voters, 46% prefer Democratic control of Congress, compared with 29% who prefer Republican control (Source: Harvard Youth Poll), indicating a major shift in voter sentiment. This political awakening led to the historic victory of Zohran Mamdani, the Mayor-elect of New York City, who ran on a strongly anti-Zionist platform criticizing Israel, proving the electorate is increasingly rejecting the establishment’s foreign policy stance (PBS News).
The congressional focus on “Christian Genocide” is a deliberate act of political deflection. While the killings are brutal and tragic, they affect both Muslims and Christians, with Muslims being the majority of the victims in the severely affected Northern states, yet this is often under-documented compared to the reports focused on Christian victims. Furthermore, a disturbing linkage has been made by some analysts, suggesting that a certain Nigerian organization providing data for the CPC push is connected to or favor Biafran separatist groups, who arguably benefit from the narrative that the country is collapsing. The primary limitation faced by Nigeria’s genuinely interested military is governance. The significant reduction of insecurity challenges, particularly in Kaduna state where citizens reside, is a good shift championed by the current administration under President Tinubu, it applies focused leadership, results follow, and this deserves commendation.
However, the war will not be won without technology; we must invest in indigenous surveillance and satellite capabilities and reject the notion of signing defense agreements with Israel, a state whose intelligence community is historically known for mounting spying devices and stealing confidential information, a risk Nigeria cannot afford. The American economic crisis provides further context; the U.S. oil economy is crumbling due to debt, and experts have pointed out that the U.S. faces challenges with unsold debt bonds and the immense leverage of indebted energy firms, suggesting that the sudden aggressive focus on Nigeria may be an economically motivated move to gain geopolitical leverage over Nigeria’s oil resources. For Nigeria, we must support our experienced military and government, reject the divisive rhetoric of “Christian Genocide” promoted by AIPAC-backed politicians, and demand that our government prioritize national security assets and data sovereignty over conditional foreign aid. Christians and Muslims lives matters, and we must work collaboratively to ensure our government understands this better.
Abdullahi Abubakar Ladan
Good Governance Advocate
