Northern Nigeria Is Just A Shadow Of Its Former Self -By Saifullahi Attahir

On April 1, 1953, Late Sir Ahmadu Bello, the Sardauna of Sokoto and the last Premier of Northern Nigeria, delivered a pivotal speech in the House of Representatives in Lagos. He articulated the region’s concerns about hastily embracing self-government by 1956, emphasizing the need for careful consideration and preparation.”

Sardauna presented compelling reasons why Northern Nigeria couldn’t be rushed into advocating for self-government by 1956, as documented in his own book, ‘My Life’.”

This reflection seeks to uncover the underlying causes of our challenges and differences, aiming to pave the way for a sound and sustainable future for all. Nigeria’s complexities are not unique; countries like India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Kenya, South Africa, and the United States offer valuable lessons in navigating similar issues.”

“We from the Northern Region have never intended to hinder the progress of any other region. We also acknowledge that regions demanding self-government for themselves alone are not inherently wrong, as each community is best suited to judge its own situation. Therefore, we believe the people of the North are the best judges of their own readiness for self-government, and we cannot commit to a fixed date without fully considering the implications. The destiny of the North rests with its people, and we must proceed with caution.”

“We of the North desire a form of self-government that will not lead to future regret. It would be unwise to set a date for self-government without carefully considering Nigeria’s current state. While we politicians often speak of Nigerian unity, we must acknowledge the complexities that exist.”

Sixty years ago, Nigeria as we know it today did not exist. Instead, the region comprised numerous large and small communities, each with distinct outlooks and beliefs. Despite the introduction of British rule and Western education, these diverse communities have yet to form a cohesive unit. Nonetheless, the British can be credited with bringing these disparate groups together, laying the groundwork for a unified nation.”

A significant milestone was reached with the introduction of the Richards Constitution in 1947, marking the first time Northern and Southern representatives sat together to legislate for a unified Nigeria. This development came 25 years after Southern representatives began participating in legislative discussions in 1922.

The 1947 Constitution was slated to last nine years, likely to give the North time to adjust. However, after just two years of experience under that Constitution, it was revised, and now we have a new one that’s barely a year old. I must note, Mr. President, that motions like the one I’m attempting to amend seem designed to undermine the positive inter-regional relationships that the current Constitution is fostering.”

“While motions like this may be expressions of opinion, I believe they can only serve to cause harm and ill-feeling. The outside world already views Northern Nigeria as conservative and backward, and some Southern Nigerians’ past utterances have reinforced this perception. Before committing to such matters, we must seek the mandate of our people. As representatives, it’s our duty to consult those we represent on major issues like this, ensuring we voice the views of the nation.

If Honourable Members from the West and East speak to this motion without amendment, representing their people, I must emphasize that we from the North have not been given such a mandate by our people.”

“No Honourable Member can fairly criticize Northern Legislators for rejecting this motion, which arbitrarily sets a date for national self-government. We’re working diligently towards self-government, despite our late start in adopting Western education. Our goal is to build a strong, lasting foundation for development. Given Nigeria’s current state, the Northern Region will not rush into decisions that might have dire consequences.”

Unless we define our goals clearly, both internally and externally, our demand for self-government may not be taken seriously. We’ve seen groups demand self-government without careful consideration. However, accepting self-government requires a thorough understanding of its implications, ensuring no region imposes its will on others.

Any country embracing self-government must do so with full awareness of its implications, eliminating the risk of one section imposing its will on others. I propose this amendment as a more suitable approach to discussing self-government at this stage, without concern that its passage would automatically bind all regions.”

“On the contrary, a private member’s motion is meant to provide an opportunity for the member and others to express their views on a subject, as I mentioned earlier.”

Countless motions won’t achieve self-government for a divided Nigeria. We can only demand and attain self-government when its meaning is fully understood by all citizens. Let’s thoroughly discuss the implications and reach a consensus among the leaders of all three Regions. This is our primary objective, and by achieving it, we’ll demonstrate our readiness to handle the significant responsibility that comes with self-government. Only then can we safely demand self-government.”

Speeches like this showcase the speaker’s depth of knowledge, clear conscience, and remarkable ability to forecast the future while demonstrating genuine concern for their constituents. In my opinion, Nigeria, particularly the North, might have been rushed into independence prematurely.

Attahir, President, National Association of Jigawa State Medical Students wrote.