Connect with us

Africa

Osun LG Crisis: The Danger Of Adedeji’s Half-truth -By Sarafa Ibrahim

This is very straightforward but it appears that the Osun APC is not prepared to tow the path of law and order, doing almost everything to foist itself on Osun people. This is quite unfortunate and a brazen assault on Nigeria’s democracy, which brings back the horrible memories of the dark days of the military rule, when judgements are willfully disregarded and subjected to the whims and caprices of those who abuses power. 

Published

on

Sarafa Ibrahim
An English poet who was appointed Poet Laureate in 1896, Alfred Austin warned us to the danger of half truth when he said “A half-truth is a whole lie.” This was exactly what I felt after reading a piece written by one Adebayo Adedeji in his desperate attempt to foist the wrong notion that the Appeal Court judgement of February 10, 2025, reinstated the court-sacked YES or NO officials.
Of a truth, the APC formulated four issues for the Appellate court to determine, but what Adedeji failed to highlight, although, it may be deliberate, was that those four issues were drawn from nine grounds of appeal that the APC submitted before the court. It is no longer a news that the Appeal Court in its judgement only resolved two of the issues while deeming the two remaining issues as mere “academic exercise.”
The Supreme Court in SC/VC/478/2021 held that “a case on appeal become academic when it would bring no benefit to any of the parties, or where there is no live issue in the claim. Also, in AG Plateau State V. AG Federation (2006) 3 NWLR (Pt. 967) 346 @ 419: Nikki Tobi, JSC (of blessed memory stated the law as follows: “A suit is academic where it is merely theoretical, makes empty sound and of no practical value to the plaintiff, even if judgement is given in his favour. A suit is academic if it is not related to practical situation of human nature and humanity.”
With this reality of the law put in perspective, the question to ask is, where exactly does the Osun APC draw its erroneous assumption that the court reinstated the sacked officials? Issue three formulated by the APC before the Court was founded on ground 6 of its appeal, which pleaded that “The learned trial Judge erred in law, with respect, when in granting the relief sought by the 1st Respondent, his lordship held that there was non-compliance with the provisions of the Electoral Act hence the whole procedure followed by the 3rd Respondent for the conduct of the Osun State Local Government Election was a nullity.”
Issue four formulated by the APC at the Court of Appeal was based on grounds 7, 8 and 9, which goes this: (7) “The learned trial Judge erred in law, with respect, when in making consequential order not sought for by the 1st Respondent, nullified the Local Government elections conducted by the 3rd Respondent on the 15th day of October, 2022 and directed all Local Government executives elected on the platform of the 1st Appellant and the 2nd, 3rd and 4th Appellants to vacate offices. immediately.” (8) “The learned trial Judge erred in law by holding that the Local Government elections held in Osun State by the 3rd Respondent on the 15th day of October, 2022 into all the Local Government Councils in Osun State was illegal and unconstitutional.” (9) “The Ruling and Judgement of the Lower Court delivered on 15th September, 2022 and 25th November, 2022, respectively, were against the weight of Affidavit evidence placed before it.”
Two things are clear from the above, and that is the fact that contrary to the lies peddled by the APC, it was the court and not Governor Ademola Adeleke that sacked the YES or NO officials, and again, the two issues deemed “academic exercise”, which by several lines of judgements in the past is not capable of giving benefit to any parties, were actually on the legal questions of the nullified election.
It therefore beat every sense of reason for anyone to confer any legal rights on the sacked YES or NO, when in fact, the Court of Appeal, didn’t resolve questions on the validity of their elections, not to talk of making pronouncement on the legal standing. It gets even worse when there is a subsisting judgement in the suit filed by the Action Peoples Party (APP) that sacked the YES of NO officials and it is yet to be set aside.
No matter how hard Adedeji or his party try to avoid that judgement, it remains a force of law until set aside by a superior court. The APC suit marked FHC/OS/CS/103/2022 also challenged the legality of the October 15, 2022, election in a separate suit from that of the PDP and the court in a judgement on November, 30, 2022, nullified the election.
Although, the APC appealed that judgement just as it did with the one in the case of the PDP, it however abandoned it, prompting the Appeal Court on January 13, 2025, to dismiss the APC appeal for want of prosecution. That judgement affirmed the Federal High Court judgement, which nullified the October 15, 2022, election and the clear implication of this is that, no one can lay claim to a process that has been voided by a court of competent jurisdiction unless set aside by a superior court.
The law is settled as emphasized by the Supreme Court in NGERE & ANOR v. OKURUKET & ORS(2014) LPELR-22883(SC), that “…The judgment of a Court of competent jurisdiction subsists until upset on appeal. While the judgment subsists, every person affected by it or against whom an order is made must obey it even if it appears wrong. Judgments take effect immediately they are delivered and every Court has inherent power to proceed to enforce judgments at once. The enforcements on delivery can only be interrupted by a stay of execution provided there is an appeal.”
This is very straightforward but it appears that the Osun APC is not prepared to tow the path of law and order, doing almost everything to foist itself on Osun people. This is quite unfortunate and a brazen assault on Nigeria’s democracy, which brings back the horrible memories of the dark days of the military rule, when judgements are willfully disregarded and subjected to the whims and caprices of those who abuses power.
Democracy thrives when all actors are prepared to abide by the rules and adhere to rule of law, but unfortunately, the Osun APC is apparently lost to its desperation for power that it feel it can pick judgements based on what suits it just because it could easily manipulate federal machineries. As things stand now, and in the face of the law, the YES or NO officials remain sacked and instead of trying to subvert democracy through crude abuse of federal institutions, the APC should concentrate on its efforts to relist its dismissed appeal before the Court of Appeal and if unsuccessful, go before the Supreme Court to set the valid judgement that nullified the October 15, 2022 local government elections.
• Sarafa Ibrahim writes from Osogbo, Osun State
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Trending Contents

Topical Issues

Breaking News5 hours ago

53,843 Drug Users Rehabilitated by NDLEA in Five Years, Says Marwa

The NDLEA says it rehabilitated 53,843 drug users and conducted 17,213 anti-drug outreaches in five years as Marwa calls for...

Jeff Okoroafor - Africans Angle Jeff Okoroafor - Africans Angle
Politics7 hours ago

The Sumner Sambo Smokescreen: Why Peter Obi’s Policies, Not Nonsense, Should Decide 2027, by Jeff Okoroafor

Sumner Sambo can call Tinubu a democrat. He can dismiss Peter Obi as policy-free. He can treat the inducement of...

CNG CNG
Forgotten Dairies8 hours ago

CNG: The Transport Revolution In Nigeria Must Get Right, by Yekini Lukmon

Now is the time to turn Nigeria’s abundant natural gas resources into affordable mobility, stronger commerce and better economic opportunities...

Crypto transaction bitcoin finance tech Crypto transaction bitcoin finance tech
Global Issues9 hours ago

Stable Money, Arbitrary Power: Tether’s Accountability Test, by Fransiscus Nanga Roka

An effective digital-dollar system needs to buy-off prevention from financial crime and unwarranted deprivation. Otherwise, the token price is described...

Aliko Dangote Aliko Dangote
National Issues9 hours ago

How Do We Explain to Our Children How Nigeria Spent Up to $25 Billion on Broken Refineries but Struck Gold with a $1 Billion Dangote Stake?, by Daniel Nduka Okonkwo

Our children should not inherit another cycle of promises, rehabilitation ceremonies, and abandoned industrial capacity. They should inherit institutions capable...

NYSC NYSC
Forgotten Dairies9 hours ago

How Do I Repay the N6 Million I Borrowed?, by Abdulkadir Salaudeen

The Tinubu government is now being advised to make a provision of trillions of naira in its annual budget as...

Breaking News12 hours ago

NYSC Abduction: Families Reveal N3m–N6m Ransom Payments as Imo Police Deny Knowledge

Families reveal how they raised millions in ransom to free 20 abducted NYSC members in Imo State as police deny...

NNPCL - fuel NNPCL - fuel
Breaking News12 hours ago

Opposition Parties Slam FG’s N1,350 Petrol Offer, Ask What Happens After 30 Days

FG plans to sell petrol at N1,350 per litre for 30 days, but Atiku Abubakar, ADC and NDC question the...

Hajia-Hadiza-Mohammed Hajia-Hadiza-Mohammed
National Issues23 hours ago

The Niger State Cash Distribution Stampede, Mass Impoverishment And Hunger In The Land, by Hajia Hadiza Mohammed

These events are unfortunate and tragic. They occur because people and hungry, impoverished by wrong economic policies of the government...

Job Joseph Job Joseph
Opinion23 hours ago

An Examination Of The Legal Framework For The Protection Of Indigenous Knowledge And Cultural Expressions Under Nigerian Law, by Jobs Joseph

For Nigeria, the adoption of a sui generis legal framework deserves serious consideration. Such a system could recognise communal ownership,...