Expediency Of Not Painting Okpebholo’s Move To Probe Obaseki With A Partisan Brush, by Isaac Asabor

Accountability is the cornerstone of good governance. It ensures that public officials remain answerable to the people for their actions while in office, fostering trust and encouraging responsible use of resources. Against this backdrop, Governor Monday Okpebholo’s decision to probe the administration of his predecessor, Godwin Obaseki, should not be hastily labeled as a political vendetta or a distraction. Instead, it should be viewed as a bold step toward institutionalizing accountability and setting a higher standard for governance in Edo State. 

However, recent reactions, particularly from Crusoe Osagie, former media aide to Obaseki, paint the probe as a smokescreen for incompetence and a diversion from pressing developmental issues. While skepticism may arise in the political arena, dismissing the probe outright as partisan is counterproductive and denies Edo State the potential benefits of a transparent review of its governance history. 

Probes, when conducted transparently and judiciously, are vital tools for promoting accountability. They allow the new administration to uncover systemic weaknesses, identify potential mismanagement, and set the stage for reforms that benefit the public. In a democracy, it is essential to periodically audit past actions to ensure the responsible use of resources and adherence to legal frameworks. 

Governor Okpebholo’s probe into Obaseki’s administration is not an indictment of the former governor’s intentions or character but rather a routine governance practice aimed at safeguarding public interest. Such reviews help establish benchmarks, clarify administrative decisions, and provide insights for future leadership. This process should be embraced, not vilified. 

One of the significant challenges of governance transitions in Nigeria is the tendency to politicize accountability. Probes are often dismissed as witch-hunts by supporters of the previous administration, while proponents of the new government may use them as tools to settle scores. This politicization undermines the essence of the process, making it difficult to achieve meaningful results. 

The current reactions from Obaseki’s camp risk falling into this trap. Crusoe Osagie’s claim that the probe is a diversionary tactic ignores the broader implications of transparency and accountability. By framing the exercise as a spectacle or a political vendetta, such rhetoric risks polarizing public opinion and derailing the genuine purpose of the investigation. 

It is important to recognize that Governor Okpebholo has just assumed office. Expecting him to roll out a comprehensive governance blueprint within weeks is unrealistic. Every leader requires time to assess the state of affairs, define priorities, and establish a roadmap for development. Conducting a probe is a logical first step in this process, as it allows the new administration to understand what it has inherited and identify areas requiring urgent attention. 

Rather than casting aspersions, critics should give Okpebholo the benefit of the doubt and allow him the latitude to lead. Rushing to label him as incompetent or devoid of ideas not only undermines his administration but also sends a discouraging message to the people of Edo State, who are eager for progress and unity. 

The Obaseki administration played a significant role in shaping Edo State’s trajectory during its tenure. If there are questions about decisions made or resources allocated, a probe provides an opportunity to address these issues comprehensively. This is not about diminishing Obaseki’s legacy but about ensuring that governance in Edo State is continuously improved. 

Moreover, the probe has the potential to uncover lessons that can guide future administrations. Governance is a continuum, and understanding past successes and failures is crucial for sustainable progress. If the probe reveals instances of mismanagement, rectifying them will benefit the state as a whole. If it finds that the administration acted within the law and in the best interest of the people that too will enhance public trust. 

Former Governor Obaseki and his allies, including Crusoe Osagie, have a critical role to play in this process. Rather than framing the probe as a personal attack, they should adopt a statesmanlike approach, cooperating fully and providing any necessary clarifications. Taking the probe in stride demonstrates confidence in their actions while in office and underscores their commitment to transparency. 

Unhelpful rhetoric, on the other hand, risks inflaming tensions and distracting from the real issues at hand. Edo State’s progress should be the primary focus, not partisan bickering or political point-scoring. By resisting the temptation to obstruct the probe with negativity, Obaseki’s camp can contribute meaningfully to the state’s development, even from outside government. 

The people of Edo State stand to gain significantly from a well-conducted probe. If mismanagement is uncovered, it could lead to the recovery of funds or assets that can be redirected toward critical development projects. If the probe clears Obaseki’s administration of any wrongdoing, it reinforces public trust in the integrity of leadership. 

Ultimately, the probe should serve as a mechanism for improvement rather than a weapon of division. It is an opportunity to ensure that governance remains people-focused and that public resources are used effectively. For this to happen, all parties must approach the process with openness and a commitment to the greater good. 

Edo State has immense potential, but realizing it requires unity and collaboration. Governor Okpebholo cannot succeed in isolation; he needs the support of all stakeholders, including those who may not share his political ideology. The probe is not an end in itself but a means to an end: building a stronger, more accountable Edo State. 

The people of Edo State must rise above partisan loyalties and prioritize progress. This means supporting initiatives that promote accountability and development, regardless of their origin. It also means holding all leaders, past and present, accountable for their actions in a constructive and non-partisan manner. 

Governor Okpebholo’s probe into Obaseki’s administration should not be painted with a partisan brush. It is a legitimate governance tool aimed at fostering transparency, accountability, and progress. For the sake of Edo State, it is imperative that all stakeholders approach this process with an open mind and a focus on the greater good. 

Governor Okpebholo deserves the opportunity to lead without undue hindrance or premature judgment. Similarly, former Governor Obaseki and his allies should take the probe in stride, resisting the urge to obstruct progress with unhelpful rhetoric. 

In the end, a transparent and judicious probe benefits everyone in Edo State. It strengthens governance, enhances public trust, and sets a precedent for accountability that future administrations will be compelled to uphold. Let us prioritize unity and progress, working together to build a better Edo State for generations to come.